The Importance of Technology Training in Legal Organizations

Among the nontraditional stakeholders who bring so much to
the delivery of legal services, technology trainers hold a special
place in my little lawyer heart.

the fundamental task of management
remains the same: to make people capable of joint performance through common
goals, common values, the right structure, and the training and development they need to perform and to respond to

Peter Drucker. The
Essential Drucker

Training is, quite simply, one of the
highest-leverage activities a [legal organization] can perform. Consider for a
moment the possibility of your putting on a series of four lectures for members
of your [organization]. Let’s count on three hours preparation for each hour of
course time—twelve hours of work in total. Say that you have ten students in
your class. Next year they will work a total of about twenty thousand hours for
your organization. If your training efforts result in a 1 percent improvement
in [the trainees’] performance, your [organization] will gain the equivalent of
two hundred hours of work as the result of the expenditure of twelve hours.

Andy Grove. “Chapter 16: Why
Training Is The Boss’s Job.” High Output Management

As an educator, I fear world-class [law
schools] and high-performance [legal organizations] overinvest in “education”
and dramatically underinvest in “training.” Human capital champions in higher
education and industry typically prize knowledge over skills. Crassly put,
leaders and managers get knowledge and education while training and skills go
to those who do the work. That business bias is both dangerous and

Michael Schrage. “How
the Navy SEALs Train for Leadership Excellence
.” Harvard Business Review.

Technology is now as important a skill
as are reading, writing, and mathematics. Everyone [including lawyers] needs to
be able to use computers, search for information on the Internet, use word
processors and spreadsheets, and download apps. These skills are now common and
useful in every profession [including law].

This imbalance in technological growth
will have some surprising implications. For instance, workers more and more
will come to be classified into two categories. The key questions will be: Are
you good at working with intelligent machines or not? Are your skills a
complement to the skills of the computer, or is the computer doing better
without you? Worst of all, are you competing against the computer?

The Productivity Case
for Technology Training

Turning Andy Grove’s point above into something more visual,
here is a chart that translates productivity gains into full-time
equivalents (FTE) at scale:

At a certain point, productivity gains add more to output than
new headcount. Technology, training, and training on technology can be
important sources of productivity gains. This remains true even when accounting
for time invested in implementation and training. The following chart is
entitled “Is It Worth The Time” and comes from my favorite webcomic, xkcd:

The math is simple. But the implications are profound. Sometimes,
we have a hard time thinking at scale. Often, we are so focused on our
immediate responsibilities that we fail to appreciate the benefits of investing
in a better way of doing things. The comic
I repeatedly use to illustrate this point:

The Case for
Training, Not Just Technology
It is tempting to read the foregoing as a simple call for
investment in new technology. That would be a mistake.
The common trap is make the purchase, flip the switch, and, BAM!, reap the productivity gains.
After all, “any
sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
” But sobering
out of MIT find that for every dollar spent on new technology, enterprises must
invest an additional ten dollars in organizational capital—training and process
redesign—to capture the technology’s full benefits. Again, for every $1 spent on technology, you need to invest $10 in training
and process.
Because people need to be trained and workflows need to be
redesigned, related studies
find that it typically requires five to seven years for an enterprise to
properly integrate new technology. Without the complementary investment of time
and resources, the technology only partially fulfills its promise, if at all.
As a result, we have plenty of existing technology not being used anywhere
close to full potential. As Greg
and I have observed, much of that latent technology capacity has been sitting
on lawyers’ desktops for over two decades. Training on already-purchased
technology can, in many instances, be more cost effective than purchasing new
technology (though not always, sometimes the already-purchased technology is
terrible, or the new technology is awesome).

The Ethical Case for
Technology Training

Even states that have not yet followed the ABA in changing
their rules of professional conduct to expressly
reference “technology”
are recognizing
the necessity
of technology for the practice of law: “Legal rules
and procedures, when placed alongside ever-changing technology, produce
professional challenges that attorneys must meet to remain competent.”
There is, of course, the cost component. Lawyers should not
be charging their clients for two hours of labor when proper use of an available machine
could reduce that labor to two minutes. Not knowing that technology could
substitute for labor and, as a result, overcharging the client is a violation
of a lawyer’s
evolving ethical duty of competence
But proper use of technology is about so much more than
speed and cost. As I show in this rather simple video, not only
does the failure to use simple features like automated numbering and
cross-references add hours of unnecessary labor, but it also multiplies the
opportunities for error by several orders of magnitude. Machines are better
suited for the mind-numbing, drudgerous, laborious, and the tedious. They don’t
get bored, tired, distracted, or bitter. Our work product should get better,
not just cheaper, when we use technology properly. But incorporating technology requires training.

The Happiness Case
for Technology and the Myth of the Digital Native
Lawyers will, of course, do the monotonous, banal, tiresome, and mundane whenever necessary. The idea of the “law
” where younger lawyers “grind out standardized legal advice,
documents, and services” is older and more prestigious than most practitioners
recognize. But the extent to which lawyers are grinding has grown to the point
where Vault is compelled to rate legal
employers on whether they actually give their young attorneys substantive
. It should be unsurprising to anyone who has ever been a young
lawyers, or around them, that associate attorney is, by far, the
unhappiest job in America
Notice how the young woman in the picture is staring at a
computer (12-22 hours per day), rather than yelling at Jack Nicholson that “I want the truth” during
her very first trial or beginning a closing argument to a jury with “I’m here to apologize. I am
young, and I am inexperienced
.” I imagine that she is actually thinking
something along the lines of:

The reality is that computers are not magic. Computers do what we
tell them to do. But we have to know what and how to tell them. While great
strides have been made for limited-purpose, consumer-level applications (e.g.,
Instagram), the user interfaces of most professional applications remain far
from intuitive.

Navigating unintuitive software is a bundle of learned
skills, not an innate talent. The
digital native is a myth
Acquiring a Twitter account in utero does not
bestow an innate ability to commune with the machines. While 83% of them sleep with their smart phone, 58%
of Millennials struggle to solve basic problems using technology
. Most of what
passes for the technological sophistication of our youth comes in the form of
passive consumption (e.g., YouTube) or, at best, rudimentary communication
(e.g., texts, Facebook). They are not trained, and therefore do not know, how
to use the technology they encounter in a professional environment. They also don’t know
what they don’t know
and labor under delusions of adequacy. These delusions and the attendant time wasted on low value activities is one source of lawyers’
Proper training could eliminate some of lawyers’ ennui by permitting them to spend more time on the high-value work that makes our vocation gratifying.
The Business Case for
Technology Training

In a law department or AFA environment, the appeal of higher
quality work in less time is self-evident. But even reducing the number of
billable hours spent on low-value work can prove profitable. Too much time on
drudgery is precisely what lawyers, law firms, and clients are cutting. From a
profit perspective, uncompensated time is pure waste that piles opportunity
costs on top of actual costs. As
I’ve written previously
, the legal market that exists today has plenty of
room to simultaneously lower costs for clients while increasing profits for law

In Sum

Technology trainers have the potential to make major contributions to the legal value stream. I
believe strongly that they are among the most undervalued contributors to the
success of a properly run legal organization. Too bad many lawyers are right to
think that traditional approaches to technology training are terrible, as I
will detail in my next post.

Casey Flaherty is a lawyer, consultant, writer, and speaker. He believes that there is a better way to deliver legal services. Better for the clients. Better for the legal professionals. Better for the bottom line. Casey is creator of the Legal Technology Assessment, an integrated Basic Technology Benchmarking and training platform. Follow Casey on LinkedIn and on Twitter @DCaseyF.

See also:

Strategic Sourcing: The Service Delivery Review
Deep Supplier Relationships
Law Firm Realizations
Structured Dialogue

The Role of Nontraditional Stakeholders in Structured Dialogue

from Blogger


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s